Skip to main content
Log in

Who Declines and Who Improves in Wilderness Therapy?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child & Youth Care Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Extensive research into wilderness therapy has not explored who benefits the most and who does not thrive in these programs.

Objective

The present study examined demographic, clinical, and familial characteristics that distinguished adolescents who improve most in wilderness therapy programs from those who deteriorate.

Method

Using data collected by the National Association of Therapeutic Schools and Programs Practice Research Network, the study sample consisted of 5639 adolescents attending wilderness therapy programs which collected and contributed data to the Practice Research Network between 2017 and 2022. Measures included the Youth Outcome Questionnaire-Self Report and the McMaster Family Assessment Device, as well as demographic, familial, and clinical data collected by program staff.

Results

Using binary and univariate logistic regression, the study found individual and familial factors that predicted membership in the top 10% of adolescent participants in terms of mental health improvement from pre-to-post wilderness therapy and those factors which predicted membership in the bottom 10% in terms of poorer mental health from pre-to-post program.

Conclusions

Considering the intensity, length, and financial resources associated with wilderness therapy program participation, these findings have important implications for wilderness therapy program staff professional development, communication of expectations to adolescents’ parents/caregivers, and program admission decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data and Materials

The data utilized in this study may be available via reasonable request to the Outdoor Behavioral Healthcare Center which owns and manages it.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The researchers thank program clients and their caregivers for completing these surveys during challenging time. The researchers also thank the staff who found the time during demanding job duties to complete assessments.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The fourth author received a research assistantship from the Outdoor Behavioral Heathcare Center. The fifth author works for Pine River Institute, a non-profit live-in care program for youths in Canada that has a wilderness therapy component. Pine River Institute did not contribute data to this dataset.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joanna E. Bettmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that none of them have conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bettmann, J.E., Martinez-Gutierrez, N., Esrig, R. et al. Who Declines and Who Improves in Wilderness Therapy?. Child Youth Care Forum (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-023-09781-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-023-09781-6

Keywords

Navigation